Family Cohesion and Flexibility: Validation of the FACES IV Package with Portuguese Adolescents

Maria Gouveia-Pereira, Hugo Gomes, Mariana Miranda, Maria de Jesus Candeias


The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale, developed by in the framework of the Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems, assess family functioning through a relational diagnosis. This instrument is subdivided into six subscales, allowing an assessment of the balanced and dysfunctional levels (extremely low and extremely high) of the dimensions of family cohesion and flexibility. The FACES IV Package also includes two scales that evaluate family communication and satisfaction. The present article analyzes the psychometric properties of the instruments included in the FACES IV Package with a sample of Portuguese adolescents in two studies. In the first study, we included a community group of 757 students and a clinical group of 67 adolescents attending psychiatric appointments. The results of this study revealed a factorial model of 24 items with satisfactory psychometric qualities, showing an acceptable adjustment to our sample. In the second study, the factorial solution obtained in the previous study was replicated with an independent sample of 707 young students. The results of this validation, show that FACES IV is a useful tool for family diagnosis among Portuguese adolescents.


FACES IV, Validação portuguesa, Adolescentes.


Abreu-Afonso, J., & Leal, I. (2016). Adaptação e validação da Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (FACES), de D. H. Olson, J. Portner e Y Lavee – versão de casal – para a População Portuguesa. Mosaico, 63, 92-107.

Andolfi, M., & Mascellani, A. (2010). Storie di adolescenza: Esperienze di terapia familiare (1st ed.). Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.

Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). IBM® SPSS® AmosTM 22 User’s Guide. Amos Development Corporation. Retrieved from

Aron, A., & Aron, E. (1999). Statistics for psychology (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Au, A., Lau, S., & Lee, M. (2009). Suicide ideation and depression: The moderation effects of family cohesion and social self-concept. Adolescence, 44, 851-868.

Baiocco, R., Cacioppo, M., Laghi, F., & Tafà, M. (2013). Factorial and construct validity of FACES IV among Italian adolescents. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 22, 962-970. Retrieved from

Ball, D., Tornaría, G., del Luján, M., del Arca, D., Masjuan, N., & Olson, D. (2013). Propriedades psicométricas del FACES IV: Estudio de validez en población uruguaya. Ciencias Psicológicas, 7, 119-132.

Ball, D., Tornaría, M., Masjuan, N., Trápaga, M., Arca, D., Scafarelli, L., & Feibuscheurez, A. (2009). Escala de evaluación del funcionamiento familiar – FACES IV: Proceso de adaptación a Montevideo, Uruguay. Ciencias Psicológicas, 3, 43-56.

Barnes, H., & Olson, D. (1985). Parent-adolescent communication and the circumplex model. Child Development, 56, 438-447. Retrieved from

Carter, B., & McGoldrick, M. (1995). As mudanças no ciclo de vida familiar: Uma estrutura para terapia familiar. Porto Alegre, RS: Artes Médicas.

Carvalho, J., Freitas, P. Leuschner, A., & Olson, D. (2014). Healthy functioning in families with a schizophrenic parent. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 25, 1-11. Retrieved from

Conger, R. D., & Conger, K. J. (2002). Resilience in Midwestern families selected findings from the first decade of a prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 361-373. Retrieved from

Desautels, J., Lapalme, M., Touchette, L., & Pauzé, R. (2016). Validation de la version française du FACES IV auprès d’une population d’adolescents francophones issus d’un échantillon populationnel et clinique. Thérapie Familiale, 37, 95-113. Retrieved from

Duvall, E. M. (1988). Family development’s first forty years. Family Relations, 37, 127-134. Retrieved from

Everri, M., Mancini, T., & Fruggeri, L. (2016). The role of rigidity in adaptive and maladaptive families assessed by FACES IV: The points of view of adolescents. Journal of child and family studies, 25, 2987-2997. Retrieved from

Ferreira, J. A., & Castela, M. C. (1999). Questionário de Ideação Suicida (Q.I.S). In M. R. Simões, M. M. Gonçalves, & L. S. Almeida (Eds.), Testes e provas psicológicas em Portugal (pp. 129-130). Braga: Sistemas Humanos e Organizacionais, Lda.

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage.

Gomes, H. S., & Gouveia-Pereira, M. (2014). Funcionamento familiar e delinquência juvenil: A mediação do autocontrolo. Análise Psicológica, 32, 439-451. Disponível em

Gomes, H., & Gouveia-Pereira, M. (2019). Testing the General Theory of Crime with the Circumplex Model: Curvilinear relations between family functioning and self-control. Deviant Behavior. Advance online publication. Retrieved from

Gomes, H. S., Peixoto, F., & Gouveia-Pereira, M. (2019). Portuguese validation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale – FACES IV. Journal of Family Studies, 25, 477-494. Retrieved from

Gouveia-Pereira, M., Abreu, S., & Martins, C. (2014). How do families of adolescents with suicidal ideation behave?. Psychology: Research and Review, 27, 171-178. Retrieved from

Greeff, A. (2000). Characteristics of families that function well. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 948-962. Retrieved from

Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. R. (1985). Patterns of interaction in family relationships and development of identity exploration in adolescence. Child Development, 56, 415-428. Retrieved from

Hamilton, E., & Carr, A. (2016). Systematic review of self-report family assessment measures. Family Process, 55, 16-30. Retrieved from

Holtman, Z., Shelmerdine, S., London, L., & Flisher, A. (2011). Suicide in a poor rural community in the Western Cape, South Africa: Experiences of five suicide attempters and their families. South African Journal of Psychology, 41, 300-309. Retrieved from

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Koutra, K., Triliva, S., Roumeliotaki, T., Lionis, C., & Vgontzas, A. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Greek version of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales IV Package (FACES IV Package). Journal of Family Issues, 34, 1647-1672. Retrieved from

Margasiński, A. (2014). Family therapy around the world: An outcome study of alcoholic families in Poland using FACES IV. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 25, 348-358. Retrieved from

Marôco, J. (2010). Análise de equações estruturais: Fundamentos teóricos, software e aplicações. Pêro Pinheiro: ReportNumber.

Martínez-Pampliega, A., Merino, L., Iriarte, L., & Olson, D. H. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale IV. Psicothema, 29, 414-420. Retrieved from

Minuchin, S. (2003). Families & family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Minuchin, S., Montalvo, B., Guerney, B. G., Rosman, B. L., & Schumer, F. (1967). Families of the slums: An exploration of their structure and treatment. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.

Mirnics, Z., Vargha, A., Tóth, M., & Bagdy, E. (2010). Cross-cultural applicability of FACES IV. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 21, 17-33. Retrieved from

Nunnally, J. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Olson, D. (1995). Family satisfaction scale. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations.

Olson, D. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 144-167. Retrieved from

Olson, D. (2010). FACES IV manual. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations.

Olson, D. (2011). FACES IV and the circumplex model: Validation study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 37, 64-80. Retrieved from

Olson, D., & Barnes, H. (1996). Family communication scale. St. Paul: University of Minnesota.

Olson, D., & Gorall, D. (2003). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes (3rd ed., pp. 514-547). New York, NY: Guilford.

Olson, D., Portner, J., & Lavee, Y. (1985). Faces III. St. Paul: Department of Family Social Science, University of Minnesota.

Olson, D., Sprenkle, D., & Russel, C. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: I cohesion and adaptability dimension, family types, and clinical applications. Family Process, 18, 3-28. Retrieved from

Pereira, M., & Teixeira, R. (2013). Portuguese validation of FACES-IV in adult: Children caregivers facing parental cancer. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 35, 478-490. Retrieved from

Rada, C. (2018). Latent class analysis approach for the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale IV among young people from Romania: The first step for validation. Journal of Family Issues, 39, 1598-1615. Retrieved from

Rivero, N., Martínez-Pampliega, A., & Olson, D. (2010). Spanish adaptation of the FACES IV questionnaire: Psychometric characteristics. Family Journal, 18, 288-296. Retrieved from

Sanderson, J., Kosutic, L., Garcia, M., Melendez, T., Donoghue, J., Perumbily, S., . . . Anderson, S. A. (2009). The measurement of outcome variables in couple and family therapy research. American Journal of Family Therapy, 37, 239-257. Retrieved from

Schrodt, P. (2005). Family communication schemata and the circumplex model of family functioning. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 359-376. Retrieved from

Thomas, V., & Olson, D. H. (1994). Circumplex model: Curvilinearity using the clinical rating scale and FACES III. The Family Journal, 2, 36-44. Retrieved from

Werner, P. D., Green, R., Greenberg, J., Browne, T. L., & McKenna, T. E. (2001). Beyond enmeshment: Evidence for the independence of intrusiveness and closeness-care giving in married couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 459-471. Retrieved from

Walsh, F. (2012). Normal family processes (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.



  • There are currently no refbacks.