Animacy norms for 224 European Portuguese concrete words

Sara B. Félix, Josefa N. S. Pandeirada, James S. Nairne

Abstract


Words are frequently used, for example, as stimuli in cognitive and linguistic research. Considering
that there are various psycholinguistic variables known to influence word processing (e.g., frequency,
concreteness), it is important to control for those variables. Recently, it has been reported that animacy
(the characteristic of being a living/animate or a non-living/inanimate entity) also affects various
cognitive and linguistic processes. In fact, animacy has been found to be one of the best predictors of
free recall. However, animacy is still an uncontrolled variable in most studies and information about
this variable is still, for the most part, absent. In this study, we provide animacy norms for a set of
224 European Portuguese concrete words. Such data should provide Portuguese researchers a helpful
tool to start considering this dimension in a systematic way in their research.

Keywords


Animacy, Word norms, European Portuguese.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Atran, S. (1999). Itzaj Maya folkbiological taxonomy: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars. In D. L. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology (pp. 119-213). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Barrett, H. C., & Behne, T. (2005). Children’s understanding of death as the cessation of agency: A test using sleep versus death. Cognition, 96, 93-108. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.05.004

Bonin, P., Gelin, M., Laroche, B., Méot, A., & Bugaiska, A. (2015). The «how» of animacy effects in episodic memory. Experimental Psychology, 62, 371-384. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000308

Bugaiska, A., Grégoire, L., Camblats, A.-M., Gelin, M., Méot, A., & Bonin, P. (2019). Animacy and attentional processes: Evidence from the Stroop task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 882-889. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818771514

Calvillo, D. P., & Hawkins, W. C. (2016). Animate objects are detected more frequently than inanimate objects in inattentional blindness tasks independently of threat. Journal of General Psychology, 143, 101-115. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2016.1163249

Cameirão, M. L., & Vicente, S. G. (2010). Age-of-acquisition norms for a set of 1749 Portuguese words. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 474-480. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.474

Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2003). What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 213-261. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290244000266

Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specifc knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1-34. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1162/089892998563752

Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (2004). Extensions of the Paivio, Yuille, and Madigan (1968) norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36, 371-383. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195584

Félix, S. B., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Nairne, J. S. (2019). Adaptive memory: Longevity and learning intentionality of the animacy effect. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31, 251-260. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1586716

Gelin, M., Bugaiska, A., Méot, A., & Bonin, P. (2017). Are animacy effects in episodic memory independent of encoding instructions?. Memory, 25, 2-18. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1117643

Gelman, R., & Spelke, E. (1981). The development of thoughts about animate and inanimate objects: Implications for research on social cognition. In J. H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible futures (pp. 43-66). London: Cambridge University Press.

Gennari, S. P., Mirković, J., & Macdonald, M. C. (2012). Animacy and competition in relative clause production: A cross-linguistic investigation. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 141-176. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.03.002

Gomes, I., & Castro, S. L. (2003). Porlex, a lexical database in European Portuguese. Psychologica, 32, 91-108.

Hagen, T., & Laeng, B. (2017). Animals do not induce or reduce attentional blinking, but they are reported more accurately in a rapid serial visual presentation task. I-Perception, 8. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669517735542

Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1991). Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: A double dissociation. Brain, 114, 2081-2094. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/114.5.2081

Hung, Y.-C., & Schumacher, P. B. (2014). Animacy matters: ERP evidence for the multi-dimensionality of topic-worthiness in Chinese. Brain Research, 1555, 36-47. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BRAINRES.2014.01.046

Kuzmanovic, B., Schilbach, L., Georgescu, A. L., Kockler, H., Santos, N. S., Shah, N. J., . . . Vogeley, K. (2014). Dissociating animacy processing in high-functioning autism: Neural correlates of stimulus properties and subjective ratings. Social Neuroscience, 9, 309-325. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2014.886618

Mandler, J. M., & McDonough, L. (1993). Concept formation in infancy. Cognitive Development, 8, 291-318. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(93)80003-C

Marques, J. F., Fonseca, F. L., Morais, S., & Pinto, I. A. (2007). Estimated age of acquisition norms for 834 Portuguese nouns and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 439-444. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193013

Nairne, J. S., VanArsdall, J. E., & Cogdill, M. (2017). Remembering the living: Episodic memory is tuned to animacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 22-27. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416667711

Nairne, J. S., VanArsdall, J. E., Pandeirada, J. N. S., Cogdill, M., & LeBreton, J. (2013). Adaptive memory: The mnemonic value of animacy. Psychological Science, 24, 2099-2105. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480803

New, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2007). Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 16598-16603. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703913104

Opfer, J. E., & Gelman, S. A. (2011). Development of the animate-inanimate distinction. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 213-238). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444325485

Popp, E. Y., & Serra, M. J. (2018). The animacy advantage for free-recall performance is not attributable to greater mental arousal. Memory, 26, 89-95. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2017.1326507

Prokop, P., & Fančovičová, J. (2014). Seeing coloured fruits: Utilisation of the theory of adaptive memory in teaching botany. Journal of Biological Education, 48, 127-132. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.837407

Räling, R., Hanne, S., Schröder, A., Keβler, C., & Wartenburger, I. (2017). Judging the animacy of words: The influence of typicality and age of acquisition in a semantic decision task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 2094-2104. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1223704

Rouse, S. V. (2015). A reliability analysis of Mechanical Turk data. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 304-307. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.004

Santos, N. S., Kuzmanovic, B., David, N., Rotarska-Jagiela, A., Eickhoff, S. B., Shah, J. N., . . . Vogeley, K. (2010). Animated brain: A functional neuroimaging study on animacy experience. NeuroImage, 53, 291-302. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.080

Sha, L., Haxby, J. V., Abdi, H., Swaroop Guntupalli, J., Oosterhof, N. N., Halchenko, Y. O., & Connolly, A. C. (2015). The animacy continuum in the human ventral vision pathway. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 665-678. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00733

Soares, A. P., Comesaña, M., Pinheiro, A., Simões, A., & Frade, C. (2012). The adaptation of the Affective Norms for English words (ANEW) for European Portuguese. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 256-269. Retirado de https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0131-7

Soares, A. P., Costa, A. S., Machado, J., Comesaña, M., & Oliveira, H. (2017). The Minho word pool: Norms for imageability, concreteness and subjective frequency for 3800 Portuguese words. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1065-1081. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0767-4

Soares, A. P., Fraga, I., Comesaña, M., & Piñeiro, A. (2010). El papel de la animacidad en la resolución de ambigüedades sintácticas en portugués europeo: Evidencia en tareas de producción y comprensión. Psicothema, 22, 691-696.

Soares, A. P., Iriarte, Á., Almeida, J. J. de, Simões, A., Costa, A., França, P., . . . Comesaña, M. (2014). Procura-PALavras (P-PAL): Uma nova medida de frequência lexical do português europeu contemporâneo. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 27, 110-123. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722014000100013

Taylor, K. I., Devereux, B. J., & Tyler, L. K. (2011). Conceptual structure: Towards an integrated neuro-cognitive account. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 1368-1401. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.568227

VanArsdall, J. E. (2016). Exploring animacy as a mnemonic dimension. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.

VanArsdall, J. E., Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Blunt, J. R. (2013). Adaptive memory: Animacy processing produces mnemonic advantages. Experimental Psychology, 60, 172-178. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000186

VanArsdall, J. E., Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Cogdill, M. (2016). A categorical recall strategy does not explain animacy effects in episodic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 761-771. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1159707

Yang, J., Wang, A., Yan, M., Zhu, Z., Chen, C., & Wang, Y. (2012). Distinct processing for pictures of animals and objects: Evidence from eye movements. Emotion, 12, 540-551. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026848




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1690

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.