Asking simultaneously about truth and familiarity may disrupt truth effects

Teresa Garcia-Marques, Rita R. Silva, Joana Mello

Resumo


Tell me something that sounds familiar and I will believe it to be true. This is a statement that we should believe because it summarizes a well-documented and empirically supported effect: the illusion of truth effect (see Dechêne, Stahl, Hansen, & Wänke, 2010 for a review). The fact is we are more likely to believe a statement if we have been previously exposed to it (e.g., Bacon, 1979; Hasher, Goldstein, & Toppino, 1977). Repetition increases truth-value generating the illusion that repeated statements are more valid than information we never heard or read before.

A general assumption of the explanations of the truth effect is that the subjective experience of processing a familiar statement is interpreted as informing about the validity of the statement (see Dechêne et al, 2010). This implies that a process of misattribution underlies repetition’s effect on judgments of truth (e.g., Bornstein & D’Agostino, 1994; Mandler, Nakamura, & Van Zandt, 1987; Schwarz, & Clore, 1983).

In this paper we present an experiment that tests such misattribution process by making more or less explicit the real source of the feeling of familiarity with statements. In this way we test whether illusions of truth decrease when it is clear (vs. unclear) that familiarity is due to previous exposure.


Palavras-chave


Illusions of truth, Repetition, Memory, Misattribution.

Referências


Arkes, H. R., Boehm, L. E., & Xu, G. (1991). Determinants of judged validity.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 576-605.

Arkes, H. R., Hackett, C., & Boehm, L. (1989). The generality of the relation between familiarity and judged validity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2, 81-94.

Bacon, F. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 241-252.

Begg, I., Anas, A., & Farinacci, S. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446-458.

Begg, I., & Armour, V. (1991). Repetition and the ring of truth: Biasing comments. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 23, 195-213.

Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological bulletin, 106, 265.

Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition, 12, 103-128.

Brooks, J. O., & Watkins, M. J. (1989). Recognition memory and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 968-976.

Brown, A. S., & Nix, L. A. (1996). Turning lies into truths: referential validation of falsehoods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1088-1100.

Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 238-257.

Dywan, J., & Jacoby, L. (1990). Effects of aging on source monitoring: differences in susceptibility to false fame. Psychology and Aging, 5, 379-387.

Garcia-Marques, L., Nunes, L. D., Marques, P., Carneiro, P., & Weinstein, Y. (2015). Adapting to test structure: Letting testing teach what to learn. Memory,23, 365-380.

Garcia-Marques, T., Silva, R. R., Reber, R., & Unkelbach, C. (2015). Hearing a statement now and believing the opposite later. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 126-129.

Hansen, J., Dechêne, A., & Wänke, M. (2008). Discrepant fluency increases subjective truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 687-691.

Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., & Toppino, T. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learn ing and Verbal Behavior, 16, 107-112.

Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of memory and language, 30, 513-541.

Jacoby, L. L., Allan, L. G., Collins, J. C., & Larwill, L. K. (1988). Memory influences subjective experience: Noise judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 240-247.

Jacoby, L. L., & Kelley, C. M. (1987). Unconscious influences of memory for a prior event. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 314-336.

Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., & Dywan, J. (1989). Memory attributions. Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving, 391-422.

Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: aging, attention, and control. Psychology and aging, 8, 283-293

Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American psychologist, 58, 697-720

Kelley, C. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1998). Subjective reports and process dissociation: Fluency, knowing, and feeling. Acta Psychologica, 98, 127-140.

Kelley, C. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (2000). Recollection and familiarity: Process-dissociation. In E. E. Tulving, E. Fergus, & I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 215–228). New York, NY: Oxford Univ. Press.

Klinger, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1994). Preferences need no inferences?: The cognitive basis of unconscious emotional effects. In P. M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 67-85). New York: Academic.

Law, S., Hawkins, S. A., & Craik, F. I. (1998). Repetition-induced belief in the elderly: Rehabilitating age-related memory deficits. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 91-107.

Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection theory: A user's guide. Psychology press.

Macmillan, N. A., & Kaplan, H. L. (1985). Detection theory analysis of group data: estimating sensitivity from average hit and false-alarm rates. Psychological bulletin, 98, 185-1999.

Mandler, G., Nakamura, Y., & Van Zandt, B. J. (1987). Nonspecific effects of exposure on stimuli that cannot be recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 646-648.

Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness & Cognition, 8, 338-342.

Reber, R., & Unkelbach, C. (2010). The epistemic status of processing fluency as source for judgments of truth. Review of philosophy and psychology, 1, 563-581.

Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological science, 9, 45-48.

Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.

Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45, 513.

Skurnik, I., Yoon, C., Park, D. C., & Schwarz, N. (2005). How warnings about false claims become recommendations. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 713-724.

Unkelbach, C. (2007). Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 219-230.

Unkelbach, C., & Greifeneder, R. (2013). A general model of fluency effects in judgment and decision making In C. Unkelbach & R. Greifeneder, R. (Eds.), The experience of thinking (pp. 11-32). New York: Psychology Press.Unkelbach, C., & Stahl, C. (2009). A multinomial modeling approach to dissociate different components of the truth effect. Consciousness & Cognition, 18, 22-38.

Witherspoon, D., & Allan, L. G. (1985). The effect of a prior presentation on temporal judgments in a perceptual identification task. Memory & Cognition, 13, 101-111.

Zillmann, D., Katcher, A. H., & Milavsky, B. (1972). Excitation transfer from physical exercise to subsequent aggressive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 247-259.


Texto Completo: PDF

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


ISBN (in print): 0870-8231 | ISBN (online): 1646-6020 | Copyright © ISPA - Instituto Universitário, 2012 | Portal otimizado para Internet Explorer 10, Firefox 32+, Chrome 37+ e Safari 5+.