Verdadeiro ou Falso? A ambiguidade de uma lista de frases permite o estudo de processos de atribuição de verdade
Abstract
Neste artigo são apresentados os dados de dois pré-testes realizados a diversas frases que representam conhecimentos mundanos. As frases foram pré-testadas relativamente à dimensão subjectiva de verdade junto de amostras da população Portuguesa aplicando dois critérios diferentes. No primeiro pré-teste as avaliações de conjunto de afirmações verdadeiras foram contrastadas com as avaliações feitas de afirmações falsas obtidas por alteração de um pequeno detalhe da frase original. No segundo pré-teste um outro conjunto de frases foi avaliada apenas na sua versão verdadeira ou na sua versão falsa numa escala dicotómica de “verdadeiro ou falso”. Os resultados salientam as frases consideradas ambíguas e a sua relevância para a investigação de enviesamentos de percepção de verdade. Adicionalmente, algumas das frases ambíguas apresentadas foram testadas relativamente ao grau de “divertimento” que promovem com o objectivo de permitir o controlo de efeitos afectivos nos seus julgamentos.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Português (Portugal))References
Arkes, H. R., Boehm, L. E., & Xu, G. (1991). Determinants of judged validity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 576-605.
Bacon, F. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 241-252.
Begg, I., Anas, A., & Farinacci, S. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446-458.
Begg, I., & Armour, V. (1991). Repetition and the ring of truth: Biasing comments. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 23, 195-213.
Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 238-257.
Garcia-Marques, T. (1999). The mind needs the heart. The mood-as-regulation-mechanism hypothesis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.
Garcia-Marques, T., Mackie, D. M., Claypool, H. M., & Garcia-Marques, L. (2010). Is it familiar or positive? Mutual facilitation of response latencies. Social Cognition, 28, 205-218.
Garcia-Marques, T., Silva, R.R., & Mello, J. (in press). Judging the truth-value of a statement in and out of a deep processing context. Social Cognition.
Garcia-Marques, T., Silva, R. R., Reber, R., & Unkelbach, C. (2015). Hearing a statement now and believing the opposite later. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 126-129.
Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., & Toppino, T. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 107-112.
Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness & Cognition, 8, 338-342.
Reber, R., & Unkelbach, C. (2010). The epistemic status of processing fluency as source for judgments of truth. Review of philosophy and psychology, 1, 563-581.
Silva, R. R. (2014). "The truth is never pure and rarely simple": Understanding the role of repetition and processing fluency on the illusion of truth effect. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. ISPA-Instituto Universitário. Portugal.
Silva, R., Figueira, P., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2013). Paradigma associado ao estudo da ilusão de verdade. Laboratório de Psicologia, 10, 223-233.
Silva, R. R., Garcia-Marques, T., & Mello, J. (2015). The differential effects of fluency due to repetition and fluency due to color contrast on judgments of truth. Psychological research, 1-17
Unkelbach, C., Bayer, M., Alves, H., Koch, A., & Stahl, C. (2011). Fluency and positivity as possible causes of the truth effect. Consciousness and cognition,20, 594-602
Unkelbach, C., & Stahl, C. (2009). A multinomial modeling approach to dissociate different components of the truth effect. Consciousness and cognition, 18, 22-38
Topolinski, S. (2014). A processing fluency-account of funniness: running gags and spoiling punchlines. Cognition & emotion, 28, 811-820.
Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 39-63.
Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81, 989-1000.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1200
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Nº ERC: 107494 | ISSN (in print): 0870-8231 | ISSN (online): 1646-6020 | Copyright © ISPA - CRL, 2012 | Rua Jardim do Tabaco, 34, 1149-041 Lisboa | NIF: 501313672 | The portal and metadata are licensed under the license Creative Commons CC BY-NC
